Meet Andy
Andy Julow was appointed to the Senate by Governor Phil Scott on May 21, 2024. He is running for a full term in the November 5th general election.
He grew up in the Lake Champlain Islands and currently lives there with his wife Corinn. In addition to being Senator, he is the Executive Director of the Lake Champlain Islands Economic Development Corporation and is the President of the Regional Development Corporations of Vermont. He owned his own business for eleven years and has served his town as the chair of the school board and development review board for a total of fourteen years.
- School Funding: The current school funding system needs to be replaced. While well intentioned, the formula is 27 years old and designed for a tax base and school population that have changed dramatically. We need to start from scratch and build a system with a broad source of funding that meets the current challenges of our schools.
- Healthcare and Equality: Healthcare needs to be accessible to all, women need to be in charge of their own care, and no one's opportunities should be limited by who they are or who they love.
- Small Business: Vermont needs to expand its offerings for small business and entrepreneur support especially navigator services that help connect mutually supporting businesses in our rural areas.
-
Paris Island
View Larger -
NVU Graduation
View Larger -
Vermont Statehouse
View Larger -
Mount Moosilauke
View Larger
-
Today I joined folks in South Hero in planning the 11th Annual Crop Hunger Walk. Last year the walk raised over $13,000 to fight hunger and support clean drinking water globally and here in Vermont.
This year's walk takes place on September 29. You can register or donate through this link Champlain Islands CROP Hunger Walk. I will be at the Champlain Islands Farmer's Market on September 21 collecting donations for the walk if you want to stop by and say hi, register, or contribute.
-
Island Arts is celebrating 40 years of great work in the community. I got to sit down with the founders and local paper yesterday to talk about their many accomplishments throughout the years.
The organization has done many big things, but my wife and I will always remember the generous scholarship that made it possible for our daughter to take piano lessons back when we had only a single income.
-
The Vermont Legislature met on June 17th to consider bills that had been vetoed. This was my first day representing the district and it was an intense but rewarding way to begin my legislative time. I spent the weeks before the session reading up on the issues, talking to as many people as I could, reading your emails, and answering your phone calls. All of these were tremendously helpful and I look forward to continuing the dialogue with all of you.
Yield Bill/Education Property Tax Rate – As someone who has chaired school boards for many years, I understand the frustration with our school funding formula. I’ve heard from many of you that this is your top concern and I completely agree. The fix though is much larger than anything that could be accomplished in a one-day session. School budgets have been determined and state law requires that a yield/base tax rate be set to fund them. The penalty for failing to do this is a 30% increase in non-homestead rates and an 82-million-dollar deficit that would need to be made up the following year. The options were not good and risking insolvency in the ed fund and damaging our credit rating were not going to set us up well for the future. I voted yes because I believed the short-term alternatives were worse but know that hard work needs to start immediately to move toward a replacement formula that controls costs, increases voter transparency, and reduces the burden on property taxes.
Renewable Energy Standard – This bill would source 100% of our electricity supply from renewable energy by 2032. Both Green Mountain Power and the Vermont Energy Coop have already committed to 100% renewables before this date as part of their strategic plans. I met with both utilities and felt the bill strengthens their hand to purchase clean energy more efficiently and to execute their strategic vision. I voted yes.
Act 250 Reform – This bill allows temporary exemptions in designated areas to build housing and long-term reform to Act 250 to remove barriers to development. The governor had a few issues with the bill, which had merit, but sustaining the veto would have risked losing all the good things in the bill that are desperately needed and have been years in the making. I think we can address those concerns independently in the next session. I voted yes.
Safe Injection Sites – A bill to create a pilot Overdose Prevention Center in Burlington. This one was difficult for me. Those who support overdose prevention sites tell me that it took them some time to warm up to the idea. I had three weeks, many conversations, and read or listened to many studies. In the end, I still had concerns. I voted no. The bill passed. Vermont needs Burlington to thrive and those affected by opioid addiction need help. I hope the program is a success.
Restorative Justice – This was a relatively minor change to the court diversion program to allow diversion before charges are filed. The governor felt it created unfunded mandates. I read the bill; it had a provision that invalidated the program unless funding was appropriated. I didn’t see any cause for concern. I voted yes.
Neonicotinoid Ban – Bans the use of Neonicotinoid pesticides starting in 2029. The bill is tied to a similar law in New York state to ensure adequate seed supply. I voted yes on this as I heard from many of you that this was important to you but will be watching closely to ensure a non-treated seed market develops for our farmers.
Data Privacy Bill – The governor had concerns that this bill could open Vermont businesses to litigation and that it was inconsistent with surrounding states and the Senate generally agreed with these concerns. There is near universal agreement that a privacy act should be in place and that the work will continue, but this one moved to the Senate too late and there was no time to adequately vet it. I voted no and the override failed.